Walbert, let me state for the record that none of my posts over today constituted or contained "personal attacks." They were removed by Aeassa because they countered his recent anti-Intel article, "QCOM inherits the Intel throne," which many people beyond us have found not only to be a grotesque distortion of reality, but downright offensive as well. Since you are not being permitted to see my comments, you are not being allowed to judge for yourself. Mas was reacting to my earlier comments, of a few days ago, for which I apologized to Ashraf and have since backed off. If Mas thinks anything I said today constituted a "personal attack" then he should go reread them...they were not.
This is a "kangaroo court" (and I am using extreme restraint in that descriptive). The people who are free to spew venom upon Intel, eg, implicitly calling PO and BK "suckers," etc, etc, deal with the counterattacks by silencing the message...and aren't there some pretty glaring examples of that in human history? This is the larger issue which speaks volumes about the validity of this Ihub message board and some of the self-anointed journalists and commentators who are writing the constant drone of Intel bash articles we have to endure.
I am not going to waste time in here, but I am also not going to allow this Intel bashing to go unchecked. There are bigger money people than I who are very irritated by the whole lot of bashers, and if Ashraf wants to be the poster-boy he will have to deal with the consequences.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
