Sara, no where in the release was the word "revenue" used. It was stated that they did over $900,000 during the last two weeks of Q2 - very possibly they wrote contracts valued at this amount that will be realized as revenue in the future. To extrapolate that the run rate in revenue is $450k plus per week is not justified from the press release. Furthering to the confusion is the stating of Q2 and Q3. It was stated that Q3 results were over $900,000 in the last two weeks of the second quarter in November. So, either there is a gross error in stating Q3 or there is more to the story as if it was revenue that was realized in Q2 why is Q3 mentioned. This is a significant point - my opinions as always.