InvestorsHub Logo

Eliot Ness

01/23/14 9:27 AM

#31504 RE: saralove #31503

What does that mean? Well for starters they are NOT disclosing info until the right time or proper moment- THATS A GOOD THING!!!!!!


Are they attempting to manipulate the PPS? Why would any company not disclose good news? lmao

Eliot Ness

01/23/14 10:53 AM

#31508 RE: saralove #31503

Has that Patent attorney figured out what the DUTV patent is? lmao. Poor excuse for a Patent attorney she was.

wallstreet1231

01/23/14 11:15 AM

#31513 RE: saralove #31503

Sara, no where in the release was the word "revenue" used. It was stated that they did over $900,000 during the last two weeks of Q2 - very possibly they wrote contracts valued at this amount that will be realized as revenue in the future. To extrapolate that the run rate in revenue is $450k plus per week is not justified from the press release. Furthering to the confusion is the stating of Q2 and Q3. It was stated that Q3 results were over $900,000 in the last two weeks of the second quarter in November. So, either there is a gross error in stating Q3 or there is more to the story as if it was revenue that was realized in Q2 why is Q3 mentioned. This is a significant point - my opinions as always.

Eliot Ness

01/27/14 2:05 PM

#31730 RE: saralove #31503

Has that Patent attorney figured out what the DUTV patent is? lmao. Poor excuse for a Patent attorney she was.