the problem is that the article is 2 years old and SVFC has yet to execute. I don't know about the other company but when I looked it appears they are generating revenue. I'm not trying to be difficult but I'd like a better reason than a 2 year old article as to why SVFC should be around the same price range as Cytori. From what I see, Cytori has a more diversified portfolio. Please further provide details how the sole technology of SVFC should outweigh Cytori's entire portfolio.
Honestly, I am getting sick and tired of SVFC not submitting communications to the shareholders. And I am even more upset that I did not sell at .75 and have now watched thousands of dollars go down the drain yesterday; and today the we are looking at 40x51...seriously?
Millipore studies: [0013] Figures 1A-E, 2A-E, 3A-E, 4A-E and 5A-E contain the results of Milipore studies that compare the stromal vascular fraction cells isolated according to the inventive ultrasonication methods vis-a-vis methods that use collagenase. The results therein show that the subject ultrasonication protocol results in about 10-fo!d more viable cells than comparable adipose samples (same amount of adipose tissue) which were treated with an enzyme that breaks down collagen (collagenase). The results therein further show that the inventive methods result in the same cell population and cell types as collagenase isolation procedures, suggesting that the inventive methods preserve the integrity of all the desired stromal vascular fraction cells, and especially the cell types identified in the Figures.
Excellent analysis... However what actually will validate all at the end is a juicy contract or partnership let's say of a fifth of what cytori got..l say 100mm will validate and send this north the way we all want.
SVFC $$$$ Patented Stem Cell Technology validated by Millipore!
Millipore studies: [0013] Figures 1A-E, 2A-E, 3A-E, 4A-E and 5A-E contain the results of Milipore studies that compare the stromal vascular fraction cells isolated according to the inventive ultrasonication methods vis-a-vis methods that use collagenase. The results therein show that the subject ultrasonication protocol results in about 10-fo!d more viable cells than comparable adipose samples (same amount of adipose tissue) which were treated with an enzyme that breaks down collagen (collagenase). The results therein further show that the inventive methods result in the same cell population and cell types as collagenase isolation procedures, suggesting that the inventive methods preserve the integrity of all the desired stromal vascular fraction cells, and especially the cell types identified in the Figures.
Quote:" However, if autologous stem cells are harvested, processed, and implanted without the concerning enzymatic process, and if the entire procedure is done in only a short time at the bedside point of care, it will cost far less than existing methods and can save the patient and the physician a great deal of time."
Quote:"There is also the yet established safety of the enzymes used to separate the stem cells from fat being potentially harmful to the patient."
****SVFC Technology Stem Cell Technology does not require enzymes, is cost effective, clinically safe, and produces 10X count and greater number of cells.
SVFC will be the leader in the area of Stem Cell Regenerative Medicine!
Answer to who will win the stem cell race?.....SVFC...of corse!