This is like dealing with corrupt small town sheriffs and judges, like in the westerns.
Aessa is simply corrupt. He is a wolf in sheep's clothing, posing as an owner of Intel shares (a large part if his portfolio), yet he bashes Intel constantly, and now he censors out those who are onto him. This is scandalous.
Whom did I attack personally? Making comments about the technical deficiencies of products isn't "taunting" people". The reference to the CEO being a "sucker" was in the abstract - I wasn't saying, "Gee, BK is a dope". I was saying, "Intel, under Otellini, was left in an unenviable position and that he likely left early to let somebody else deal with the cleanup".
BTW, a product that fails to win design wins profitably and comes to market an entire product cycle late is - in my book - a failure. But I'm just an investor who wants Intel to make money, not a fanboy.