I have.
This is my explanation. I'll type as slowly as I can.
There was just one sale by Epic Investments on 1/17 of 805,538 shares. These are reported as "directly held".
The shares reported as sold by Epic Pharma, Narine and Nigalaye are the same shares.
These shares are indirectly owned through Epic Investments.
The amounts they are reporting are the pro-rata number of shares they own through Epic Investments.
It's so simple....even a seasoned trader can understand it.
Oh, and here is the exact reply I received from Diane...
You are correct.
The forms explain that – especially if one reads the footnotes.
Epic Investments (EI”) is the direct holder.
Epic Pharma (“EP”), Ashok and Jai are indirect owners of EI.
Anytime EI has a filing event, EP, Ashok and Jai all must file as an indirect owner of EI.
Therefore, for each triggering event of EI, there are three additional filings for the indirect owners for the same event.
As for the total ownership in Box 5 of the form 4’s, the total ownership being reported for Jai and Ashok is only the percentage of ownership each has personally of EI and EP.