InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

sgolds

04/29/03 12:57 PM

#3395 RE: wbmw #3386

wbmw, By the way, a mainframe most certainly is considered a server.

Yes, although that is a matter of branding as much as anything else. Mainframe was the accepted term for a computer which ran applications and interacted with the user through some sort of terminal device (cards, tapes, APL terminal, etc.).

Networks evolved around minicomputers first, and microcomputers soon afterwards, which distributed processing. A server thus was invented as a common storage receptacle and for running mundane jobs like printing. Soon email was invented as the first real server application.

Now, IBM was late to the networking party and was selling mainframes hookup up to dumb terminals way after everyone else moved on. Then when IBM was ready to join the party, they tried to hijack it with Token Ring and SNA. A very few years later they realized that Ethernet was going to predominate and they'd better start learning the lingo of the new order.

Hence IBM mainframes where rechristened 'servers' and served as application servers for PCs connected by Ethernet.

So mainframes are servers because IBM says so.

:)
icon url

yourbankruptcy

04/29/03 1:30 PM

#3411 RE: wbmw #3386

By my understanding the IDC's worldwide quarterly server tracker is not available online for free. But from what I can find IBM, HP and Sun are the biggest in term of revenue and IBM is the fastest growing vendor among them.
http://www.datatrend.com/news/currentnews/news_02_28_03.html

"This quarter there was no clear leader as the top three vendors fought head-to-head, resulting in ties in multiple segments of the UNIX market."
http://www.commsdesign.com/pressreleases/prnewswire/60207

Windows server market is not very clear from those posted links.

icon url

jhalada

04/30/03 11:31 PM

#3566 RE: wbmw #3386

wbmw,

IBM might lead in server revenue, but HP sells in higher volume.

I could agree with that.

Joe