InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

ponzi_implosion

01/13/14 8:15 PM

#255669 RE: stocker11 #255662

If I recall correctly there was a pretty hefty mechanics lien placed against the company. Thats usually a good indicator that someone is not getting paid.
icon url

retiredptt

01/14/14 8:54 AM

#255707 RE: stocker11 #255662

I wasn't insinuating that anyone wasn't being paid.

If you look at the filings costs for direct labor have not been included in JBI's $100 per barrel Q2 numbers or the $85 per barrel Q3 numbers! Its not that those people aren't being paid its that those people are being paid but the monies paid to them aren't being factored into JBI's cost per barrel estimates. Its a, now that I know better, predictable Bordynuik move to continue to mislead the shareholder!!! Someone please correct me if I'm wrong.

Does anyone know if we have the information to estimate how operator salaries and benefits will impact costs per barrel? I'd be curious to know how many dollars per barrel it'd add and this is the information I continue to say is knowingly being kept from us by Bordynuik as it gets us further and further from his $10 per barrel statements. Will it add $1, $10, $20 or more???

All of this will be very important going forward especially if companies are hesitant to purchase processors. To make money, not shareholder money but real money, JBI will be expected run in the manner they told us they would dating back to 2009 when many of us bought shares and if they can't then let them fail!



Day Low Yesterday
0.0601 ... and John Bordynuik did this to himself. He can't be trusted and the way we receive information proves it.