InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

G3trich

01/10/14 8:56 PM

#45531 RE: FGB4 #45528

Good response by Kurt. They are dealing with it. I personally think that they do not need to release a PR refuting the article. It will give more power to these SA writers. Management's lack of "quick" response highlights their experience in my opinion. If you believe in the company and it's prospects in the future, who cares about the day to day PPS movements? What matters is future potential.
icon url

nrcmedia

01/10/14 9:35 PM

#45544 RE: FGB4 #45528

You can forget about Kurt doing anything other than feathering his own nest. He is the same guy who lied to me last year right before the dilution. Good luck with him.
icon url

The Whale

01/11/14 12:51 AM

#45609 RE: FGB4 #45528

Well said, FGB4.
icon url

LAmerica

01/11/14 10:13 AM

#45680 RE: FGB4 #45528

FGB4 re kurt...

Thanks.. Tone of late has been careful and succinct. As it should be with the amount of moving parts, the stakes and the pedigree of the exec on board.

Reading between the lines, he separated the 'matter' and the business. I like that b/c he says they are dealing with both as they deem of importance. Ie, developments as they manifest themselves soon will trump and squash worms like glover.