InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

xxxxcslewis

01/09/14 2:16 PM

#14522 RE: gabeh #14521

There are 55,000 common shares not owned by Mr. Lenfest.

Insiders own around 25,000 or more of those shares so altogether there are only around 30,000 shares that could be considered in the float. I think posters on this forum own the majority of those shares; probably a large majority of those shares, or at least markers indicating their ownership.

As I mentioned previously, the most practical means for Mr. Lenfest to achieve his benevolent objectives would be the anti-dilutive return of common shares to the corporation.

That would also increase the earnings per share.

I am forecasting more than $1.00/share in Q4 based on the current share structure. I also anticipate an increasing earnings per share each subsequent quarter for the foreseeable future. So for 2014 $5 to $8 per share is possible more if Mr. Lenfest made the decision described above.
icon url

AlanC

01/09/14 4:34 PM

#14531 RE: gabeh #14521

I don't recall anyone stating there were only 55,000 shares in total. 55,000 excluding Mr. Lenfest's which are not for sale I have heard but 55,000 total not! Go TEVE!!!
Revenues/earnings/dividends!
No question Mr Lenfest could exclude his shares from receiving dividends if he chose to do so! Examples have been posted here in the past.