InvestorsHub Logo

samseaborn1

01/06/14 1:57 PM

#66256 RE: redburns #66254

Ding Ding Ding - Give that man a prize
and welcome to

WATERLOO!!!

Tulaz1

01/06/14 3:19 PM

#66257 RE: redburns #66254

In addition, plaintiffs want multiple defendants together in a single lawsuit in hopes that
when one or more of the defendants settle, it will increase the pressure on other defendants to
also settle to avoid being the “last man standing” in the case.

http://www.hunton.com/files/Publication/e7e49e13-2327-4d36-a04c-1dcc301527c4/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/b2cc8f60-eb07-41f7-8949-787a644f1cff/Multiple_Defendant_Paper_AIPLA.pdf
==============================================================
Plaintiff MyMedicalRecords, Inc. (“MMR”) and Defendant Walgreen Co. (“Walgreen”),by and through their respective counsel, with reference to the following facts:
A. During the week of November 11, 2013, the parties engaged in
various telephone conversations regarding a resolution to this matter and a potential face-to-face meeting between the parties. Ultimately, the parties agreed to an in-person meeting in Deerfield, Illinois on Tuesday, November 19, 2013.

B. On Monday, November 18, 2013, Plaintiff filed a Motion to Strike Walgreens’ Supplemental Invalidity Contentions and set the hearing for December 23, 2013. Consequently, Walgreens’ Opposition is due on December 2, 2013.

C. The parties met on November 19, 2013 in Deerfield, Illinois. They agreed to schedule a second conference call, one week later on November 26, 2013. That meeting was rescheduled to December 3, 2013.

D. The parties also exchanged e-mails regarding a resolution after the meeting on November 19, 2013 and continue to discuss a resolution of the matter.

E. The parties desire to focus on a potential resolution

https://ecf.cacd.uscourts.gov/doc1/031117959847

http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=95379739