InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rickn23

01/03/14 3:18 PM

#11913 RE: MC10459 #11912

I'm thinking he didn't get what he was looking for, here.

I went back and read his posts. He seemed to think that REDG was a pump and dump scheme and a good investment opportunity (also claimed he was a newbie).

I'm thinking he works for the law firm suing over the pump and dump scheme and was trolling for info. Courts in session again in Feb. (?).

Or, maybe he found out there are more than 2 million shares in the float and just went away.

Edit
Lawsuit was on newsletter promo junk, not necessarily pump and dump. I think.

edit 2
"We are not currently a party to, nor are any of our property currently the
subject of, any other material legal proceeding other than as set forth herein.
None of our directors, officers, or affiliates is involved in a proceeding
adverse to our business or has a material interest adverse to our business.

On May 13, 2013, George Sharp ("Plaintiff") filed a Complaint in San Diego
Superior Court, Central District, Case No. 37-2013-00048310-CU-MC-CTL, against
14 companies, including us (collectively, "Defendants"). We were served with the
Complaint on May 23, 2013. The Complaint alleges that the Plaintiff received
unsolicited promotional emails being sent by Defendant, Victory Mark Corp. Ltd.,
discussing the other 13 corporate Defendants, including us. The Plaintiff is
seeking liquidated damages in the amount of $1,000 for each email he received
for a total of $1,204,000 collectively for all Defendants. After denial of our
Demurrer to the Complaint, we filed an Answer to the Complaint. The Plaintiff
has filed a Demurrer to our Answer, which will be heard February 14, 2014.
icon url

coopaloop21

01/04/14 11:58 AM

#11917 RE: MC10459 #11912

There's always the chance he was telling lies to try and drive down the price to buy more....but, to be honest it looked more like he just didn't know what he was talking about