Replies to post #40486 on DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[thtideisturning]

frogggy:

"While it is doubtful that you would welcome a response to your 'unquestionable' thought"

Transferrence works to reveal you, ...not me bro.

I will reply to your post, ...have NEVER NOT welcomed responses, pal.

Are you not a thorn..in the side of most all discussion? ...Really? Your mode of communication? No? ...Yes?
So be it.... ...Although having become tremendously boring, ...you certainly do command an audience.
Such is the state of the times, I guess. :o)

[cloud477]

Frogdreaming -
"Unfortunately for us, the current prey, we cannot determine from our own vantage point whether the method by which we provide the sustenance is more representative of a symbiotic relationship or a parasitic one. All we know is that we are losing blood. "

I seldom agree with you, hardly ever as a matter of fact, but I do appreciate your unique, if a bit dramatic, viewpoints that you conjure up on this board.

best of luck

jack

[thtideisturning]

[addendum] Frogdream:

You said, "In summary, the animal has changed. Whether it has stuck to its original path (noble cause or scam) or has evolved a new direction (again noble cause or scam) is not yet completely apparent. Unfortunately, the only ones that could tell us, won't speak to us. (Perhaps that is telling enough.)"

Nicely said.

~~

I, personally, do apparently see some kind of physical progress going on...or I woudn't bother to post about it. Not in actuality: I've NEVER been inside DNAPrint genomics, ...but based on information suggesting/documenting improvements. To what ends, I couldn't possibly know. & I’m not likely to get premature answers from the “animal” itself, ...neither via email nor the phone. That form of lawful ambiguousness has always been a [seemingly unavoidable] disappointment where DNAP[G] is concerned. I understand when s p o o k shakes a stick at that notion as well, ...but disclosure is a treecky deeck whether peessin' in the wind, or into a puddle, ...or into the sea from high atop a rocky knoll.

My primary points were clear today, though, and that's pretty much that.
...The fork is in me.

[Easyman51]

frog, from your post and past conversations I take it that at one time you were invested in DnaPrint Genomics. You have made it abundantly clear, atleast in part, as to why you are critical of Dr. Frudakis, and this latest post reveals much of your viewpoints as to Managements "shareholders philosophy."

I like to give credit when deserved, and you demostrated, in this last post, an anology I truly enjoyed and, to a degree, feel you have captured a certain essence. Very provoking.

What intrigues me, laying personalities aside as to the parties involved, is what you initially considered worthy in DnaPrint and if there might be some redeemable (profitable) qualities left in the cubbords, or is this Company bereft of benefits?