Replies to post #77893 on NanoViricides Inc. (NNVC)

[davidc2]

He says that he and his cohort are doing the due diligence for you investigating these companies.

My guess is he's paid in shares to act as a shill. He makes brash over the top comments to sell his pump reports to unassuming investors who get suckered in.

[leifsmith]

In my opinion, Cox provides interesting and potentially profitable clues. His research is a starting point only. Then you must do your own research, thinking, and risk evaluation. On this basis his newsletters are, to me, worth every cent his publishers charge.

[JG36]

Cox has had far more dogs than winners. If I were to do a Cox style newsletter it would work something like this. I'd pick a bunch of cheap pink sheet and OTC stocks using a roulette wheel, rejecting only those companies that are obvious frauds. Then I'd write up long articles about why the selected stocks are cool.

Later, I'd brag in my advertising about the 20% of those stocks that doubled. As for the 80% that went to zero, I'd say you should have done your own due diligence.