InvestorsHub Logo

Escabar

12/27/13 9:41 PM

#105952 RE: The Whale #105947

They wont be able to prove legal rights under federal law... the whole issue is the use being within the cannabis industry... you are definitely no lawyer... LOL at using a disclaimer on a site that is ONE GIANT DISCLAIMER... we use aliases...

cybear_mn

02/16/14 8:54 PM

#121277 RE: The Whale #105947

The trademark has been abandoned...!
Trademark denied for PharmaJanes!
Quote:
Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, as used in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the application, is not in lawful use in commerce. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127.
Here is the beginning of the document:
Quote:
APPLICANT: I Equity Corp

CORRESPONDENT’S REFERENCE/DOCKET NO:

N/A

CORRESPONDENT E-MAIL ADDRESS:

henry@iequitycorp.com

OFFICE ACTION

STRICT DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO THIS LETTER

TO AVOID ABANDONMENT OF APPLICANT’S TRADEMARK APPLICATION, THE USPTO MUST RECEIVE APPLICANT’S COMPLETE RESPONSE TO THIS LETTER WITHIN 6 MONTHS OF THE ISSUE/MAILING DATE BELOW.

ISSUE/MAILING DATE: 6/26/2013

The assigned trademark examining attorney has reviewed the referenced application and has determined the following:

NO SIMILAR MARKS

The trademark examining attorney has searched the Office’s database of registered and pending marks and has found no conflicting marks that would bar registration under Trademark Act Section 2(d). TMEP §704.02; see 15 U.S.C. §1052(d).

Applicant, however, should note the following refusals.

SECTIONS 1 AND 45 REFUSAL – NOT IN LAWFUL USE IN COMMERCE

Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, as used in connection with the goods and/or services identified in the application, is not in lawful use in commerce. Trademark Act Sections 1 and 45, 15 U.S.C. §§1051, 1127.


Henry never responded.

winningman

04/03/14 8:57 AM

#130291 RE: The Whale #105947

Pretty lame not responding to office action. There is no excuse for that. As slow as these guys are on everything, I'm sure they responded. If not then well...