InvestorsHub Logo

Jim Bishop

02/02/06 12:09 PM

#29273 RE: shortchange #29271

And just exactly what good would that do? It's all about order flow and making money man, not wasting time and money.

cowboycadillac

02/02/06 12:09 PM

#29274 RE: shortchange #29271

Well then it seems to me if Sandy is so concerned as he mentioned in an email, he should say so publicly now so we all can believe what you have stated! Without it dilution is the only explanation!

Vulcan

02/02/06 12:11 PM

#29281 RE: shortchange #29271

Scenario:
MICA and USBB sell short 2 billion shares back when the stock was at .0065 and 6 months later now that we have a viable company they have to cover.

sojourner

02/02/06 12:16 PM

#29296 RE: shortchange #29271

Is the transfer agent lying to us? IF there's no dilution and little, if any, selling by legitimate shareholders, the only explanation left is massive shorting (naked and otherwise). With the signal presence of Bishop here, that scenario is plausible.


"Eliminate all other factors, and the one which remains must be the truth." -Sherlock Holmes, "The Sign of Four" (1890)