Some posters are incapable of understanding that almost all investments have negative and positive aspects. We all must weigh one against the other and then make our choice. The least valuable posts are the ones that parrot the same obvious information over and over again or worse just make stuff up. These are not posts intended to contribute to a discussion. They are what I call euphemistically bad faith arguments. An original well researched thought would be more helpful. Even if it is always negative, I'm okay with that.
Well maybe in your vast experience why a stockholder should feel positive about the directors getting paid for years when there has been absolutely nothing but failed attempts at being a successful company? Why when many of the posters here feel that we are just this close to being uplisted that the former CEO was for years replaced when STWA is on the verge of blasting off? And most important why after all these years with the same posters saying what in hindsight was all puffery anyone should put any credence into what they say? There is an old saying that the proof is in the pudding.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
