Replies to post #7873 on Cdex, Inc. (fka CDEX)

[ontheedge01]

d4diddy:

Oh my, is the science man who speaks of the non-revolutionary CDEX tech, not able to fill in the blanks.

To do so answers what you have requested.

Now do your homework diddy. If you cannot, just say you cannot.

Dance, you bet I can dance, I bet Sassy and I could start in her town and two step all the way to Brownsville!

The test is not a game diddy, so fill in the blanks.

The test is to see if what you post can be backed up by the factual test I asked you to fill in.

YOU CLAIM THE TECH IS NOT REVOLUTIONARY! Do you speak the truth or do you not?

Fill in the blanks, and show us just how smart you really are.

Still waiting

[d4diddy]

THREE SIMPLE QUESTION THAT ONTHEEDGE CANNOT ANSWER:

1. Please show me which claims make CDEx patent application No. 10/268678 "revolutionary"?

2. Can Valimed detect non-sterility in a med, admixture or solution?

3. Please show me where I've "lied about the science" and "posted untruths" as you continue to claim as fact?

Thank you.

RA, talk with you later, this is my 15th post.

Edge got off easy tonight! LOL!!!


P.S. Edited to add this final comment from RA's post:

"I was talking about your claim that Poteet's objection letter could be found at the Attorney Generals office in Phoenix Arizona[\u]. You did say that, right? Now you're saying you think they might have a copy. That's a completey different tune you're singing now".

Wait till you hear what I've already found out, this dude posts without thinking things through clearly. He really does. And have no doubt, he will eventually claim the letter is locked in the secret SEC files!

How convenient is that! LOL

P.S.S. Edit number two: Ontheedge has just got himself in some very hot water!!!!