InvestorsHub Logo

stolpen

12/19/13 4:47 AM

#51886 RE: melehuna #51884

Hi Melehuna!
Think you percieved my statement wrong :-)
Of course it holds value to verify that buildings and operations are actually there, but its no different from what's already claimed in the quarterly, if it was not Chinese most would have trusted the Q-reports as a legit description of assets and operations and concentrated at trying to digest how profitable it is and will be...
So what I say is that Penser sends emissaries down there to verify operations and assets doesn´t add much to the inconsistencies they feel is there still in the reports and presentations which renders their approval impossible yet at this point....
To see what is actually present atm or to believe whats claimed to come years to come in terms of profitability are different things to me, and during this period as a shareholder he has claimed numerous developments and rewards for us cofounders that is yet to be realized so I pardon that I have a hard time believing what I havn´t seen proof of nomore.
That said I do value your onsite reports immensely have a great Christmas and a wonderful trip.
Regards.