InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

rcaptain

12/18/13 2:32 PM

#46847 RE: JJSeabrook #46845

Thanks for posting JJ
icon url

tutankhamen

12/18/13 2:48 PM

#46851 RE: JJSeabrook #46845

Point taken but however you call this, the reason the stock is down is:

1. $800K is a pittance to "set aside" the injunction
2. The injunction is where the teeth were in terms of getting ZTE to the table
3. More delays in more countries are not = $$$
4. More delays here mean higher liklihood of dilution to fund another year of fighting.
icon url

foreontee

12/18/13 2:58 PM

#46854 RE: JJSeabrook #46845

To Vringo?
icon url

sab63090

12/18/13 3:12 PM

#46856 RE: JJSeabrook #46845

JJS: Thanks for effectively passing on the real truth. I don't like to be put out as a BS guy and I only reported what I had received in an email, thinking that it was the reason for today's drop in price. I had read about the bond issue, but I took the fact that the injunction as being "overturned" as reported was the latest information. Sorry for the confusion, but I dislike some people jumping all over me...2 names pop up and I won't forget. RC Captain was the only person who responded with some class. You can be assured that I pay attention to your posts, also.
icon url

Serpico2005

12/18/13 6:15 PM

#46870 RE: JJSeabrook #46845

Maybe Goog would be willing to pay up in Rupees...eom