Replies to post #41304 on Ariad Pharmaceuticals Inc fka ARIA

[grandma_of_jbraika]

Doctors know more about Iclusig than the FDA, I believe patently silily. They report SAEs per standard criteria. The FDA knows more about the standard than the doctors. If the FDA violates the standard, it must be intentional with an agenda.

The clinical trial doctors have treated and examined the patients physically. Don't they know about the safety/toxicity of Iclusig more than anybody else?

Patently silly or not, I firmly believe Doctors know more about Iclusig than the FDA, for a large number of doctors have concluded that "Ponatinib is well tolerated and Adverse Events are manageable". They are a great deal more than any individual doctor, no matter how renowned or how malicious to Ariad an individual may be.

I have to admit that I am patently silly as pointed out by the wise individual who is malicious to Ariad. However, this individual is no less patently silly than me. This bright person even cannot count. The wise man failed to count how many doctors had contributed to the ASH presentations. His wisdom patently sillily beleved that it was an individual's presentation.

I would not believe the conspiracy theory at all if someone who is malicious to Ariad and always speaks for Novartis did not attack the conspiracy theory constantly.

[DewDiligence]

The FDA knows more about standard criteria, per which doctors report SAEs, than the clinical trial doctors, at least seems to me. If the FDA does not follow them, it must be intentional with an agenda.

There is no single, industry-standard way of reporting adverse events in a clinical trial or a set of clinical trials. More discussion of this topic in #msg-93667623.