He didn't come here to explain himself. He sent a letter containing non public information to a targeted amount of large shareholders with the specific goal of tanking the stock. Those large holders who sold, are probably the 20 John Does listed in the case. Some of them still post here. Ive seen the original email and all of their names are there. It wont take much to subpoena their trade history. He did the same thing at another company. The biggest mistake B&L made was not doing their due diligence on EG.
Considering I have emails from him confirming what was put out in PRs, ill take my shot with B&L. EG has zero credibility in my opinion.
What is it all about when you search for the truth.
The defendant wants to hide the truth because he is generally guilty. The defense attorney's Job is to make sure the Jury does not arrive at that truth.
The plaintiff wants to hide the truth because he is generally guilty. The plaintiff attorney's Job is to make sure, that the Jury does not arrive at that truth.
This brings me to the conclusion: In court: quid pro quo.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
