InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

growthstocks

12/11/13 4:12 PM

#101373 RE: Nabbbss #101371

That amount got added to the OS; When you say it was already in the mix; why then did the OS go up?????
icon url

CKTrader

12/11/13 4:13 PM

#101374 RE: Nabbbss #101371

by that def. then the 80 million should be counted...can't have it both ways
icon url

Y U Axing Me

12/11/13 4:18 PM

#101376 RE: Nabbbss #101371

There IS no "dilution." The 3.6-Million-Shares represented a
PRIVATE PLACEMENT from/by/to a Shareholder, several years ago.


Can you provide proof of your statement of fact?

I believe there was a post stating a belief of that, but I see you're stating it as fact.
icon url

Y U Axing Me

12/11/13 4:23 PM

#101378 RE: Nabbbss #101371

Yes...of course. They didn't sell those shares when the stock was at $.02 or $.03....they waited until the stock was at .006 to sell.

Makes lots of sense.

Sales are down and VV is not taking off. Frankly, I'm not that surprised that dilution is occurring.
icon url

Y U Axing Me

12/11/13 4:37 PM

#101379 RE: Nabbbss #101371

There IS no "dilution."


Regardless of where the shares come from, it DEFINITELY IS dilution.

The number of outstanding shares increased. That, my friend, IS DILUTION!!