"Publishing rights to many if."
I'm sorry, 'if'? intellectual rights? Not sure what that means.
Just as you well know, your fin's to the OTCMarkets have no official regulated standing, thus it would only be natural for any normal share investor to question the veracity of the numbers. Thats a given.
But I question your involvement with a number of stock tout performers who have saturated chat boards and wire services with questionable propaganda. Including the PR that was posted to this board a short while ago. Some even thought it was from you. I must say, if you, Mr. Foley have condoned these people who spew some wild 'facts' about Ntek, you are eroding Nteks credibility rapidly with the general trading public who look to the internet for guidance.
Mr. Foley, if you. for some wild reason have no input to these promoters, specifically the one that put out today's note, then you seriously need to take control of what they are doing to your company image as far as the trading public is concerned. Much is not positive. Really!
Note, I said 'trading public'. There is no consumer buying public advertising of Ntek/ NanoTech anywhere I've seen yet. All Ntek advertising is stock focused. No one sells their product on a stock chat board.
Gltu. And I don't wish prison on anybody. However, you plead guilty to at least 2 counts, thus you will pay the piper. More power to you if you pull off probation. But I'll tell you this, if pacer has anything different or more counts, whatever, than what you personally have posted with that lawyer letter, your word will be instant mud and justifiably so. And that will hound you for as long as stock boards can create Ntek stock boards.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
