Replies to post #8539 on FuelStream, Inc. (FLST)

[Green&Gold]

Regardless of the outcome of these proceedings, no one really knows what kind of liability Fuelstream will have in this. We can speculate and speculate, but the truth is the ex-CEO here is a lawyer. Lawyers are very good at setting up corporations to shield them from these types of situations. Companies buy other company's assets every day without assuming the liabilities. A company I worked for went through that very situation a few years back. And, the company I work for now is owned by a lawyer, and trust me there are loopholes everywhere that these guys know that can protect them from the liabilities of these types of situations. Bottom line is that we don't know.

I would dare to speculate also that the merger into Fuelstream may have been exactly for this purpose. Wagner will have to deal with this personally either way, but I have a feeling the company's business will be protected. That's just my opinion.

[john runyon]

A few thoughts hopefully someone can email Catala about:

It appears that only 1 of 2 scenarios is 100% accurate:
1- Wagner holds all of the actual control in company
If this true than the indictment and potential future problems for him are a major concern for us shareholders and the company has been putting on some pretty deceptive vibes to make people he is nothing more than a salesman and it would proven they were and are wrong.

2- Attorney John Thomas holds the controlling interest in this company and he holds the 200 shares.
If this is true and I doubt it he would be violating many SEC rules and cannons of ethics by providing opinion letters on behalf of a company he holds controlling interest in and that would be a major conflict of interest. He has a history already of being barred from CFTC and also being sued for fraud by providing knowingly false opinion letters.

Wouldn't the holding of these 200 shares and ultimately the full control of this company be a material fact subject to an 8k. I would think the public would be entitled to know this information as it is the most relevant missing piece of information needed to see the potential for the future of this company.

Why was Charles Arnold/ Summit Trading issued another 1 million plus shares from the company for consulting:
what could he of possibly done for a company with almost no revenues and unable to obtain any financing to be worth 1 million more shares over his 333,000 already issued to him.

I hope that we as shareholders can get answers to these questions

[zwitterion]

I don't think Wayne Kepple will jump to his resuce either

[KashGreen]

Feds. and DOJ have a 97% conviction rate.. Enough said.