InvestorsHub Logo

apennyortwo

12/04/13 10:39 AM

#243 RE: kentonmag1 #242

I don't see the difference between heavily shorting a stock until it falls to the ground and insiders buying shares for next to nothing and dumping them at higher prices. I don't have a problem with shorting. My point is why be a hypocrite? ( not you personally). Why talk trash on the insiders pumping their garbage and at the same time sell as many shares short as you can get you hands on? Its basically the same thing.

Daenerys

12/04/13 10:46 AM

#244 RE: kentonmag1 #242

I still don't get it. The insiders are required to report their trading activity, right?

DrContango

12/04/13 11:45 AM

#249 RE: kentonmag1 #242

km: you are 100% correct!

Legit short-sellers who actually sell real borrowed shares (as opposed to naked short-sellers) play an important role in the stock market eco-system by helping to establish an equilibrium of share price.

The insiders of sham companies own valueless shares of a worthless company. The illusion of a viable company is part of a confidence game and the value of the company is jacked up via deception.

That said, I've been "bashing" MDDD since it began trading because I hate obvious scams. I'm on the sidelines...

Which brokerages had access of MDDD stock to sell short???

Thanks,

Doc