InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

iandy

12/03/13 10:25 PM

#40405 RE: grandma_of_jbraika #40404

I never called you wacky. I said I didn't think you were wacky so I went back and found your quote in the comments. Please don't make a thing out of it. I simply felt you should have specified your quote was not from the article you referred to. With all due respect I don't understand a lot of the stuff you post but I imagine you don't understand me either. You might not be able to fathom the idea, but someone could think the company screwed up and own the stock. I've owned several stocks over the years that I thought had less than ideal management. I bought some Ariad when it went up and sold after it went up a buck. I might very well continue to trade the stock. I know the disposition of some posters here so I avoid posting.
I don't think people should go after each other.

How people treat you is their karma.
How you react is yours.
icon url

grandma_of_jbraika

12/04/13 11:51 AM

#40430 RE: grandma_of_jbraika #40404

Anyone worried about the class action suits?

"No. From a legal perspective, suits are without merit,...and no factual predicate. No fraud involved, ONLY a possible "leak" at FDA. Further, ARAID has insurance against lawsuits via a defense fund established by insuring carrier.

Lastly, what's really at issue here is NOT ARIAD, but what and how info was used to adversely affect the PPS," answered dfaduke on the YMB.

The doctors' data to be presented at the 55th ASH on the coming weekend will probably help Ariad rather than the law firms.