shareholder perspective?
you do realize we think Berg is a thief in the night, a liar, and someone not to be trusted. is there any other perspective that proves us wrong. he deliberately excluded shareholders in everything and undervalues the company by at least a 100 million in my estimation, thus he would have stole from shareholders.
that letter is a joke and just a testament to what a shell the company is, a money making tool for Berg.
Berg only needed to give them a 10th of what he just came up with to keep the doors open before BK.
they are stronger now, I can smell the stench all the way from here.