InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MilesTeg

11/18/13 1:45 PM

#46267 RE: Brenum #46266

Fair enough.
I was para-phrasing from several differnet posts so I don't attribute it all to you.
I appreciate your realist pov and welcome different opinions.

Thanks for the reply, Bre.

icon url

LitesOut

11/18/13 1:53 PM

#46268 RE: Brenum #46266

I actually think the mention of the new compounds was meant to further entice a future partner and illustrate the strength of the pipeline.

I would imagine that when CTIX finds a partner there will be an understanding, or possibly even enumerated language in an agreement, that the partner (presumably for B) will have first crack at future drugs in the CTIX pipeline should CTIX decide to find a partner for them. I understand the concern about limited resources and having too many irons in the fire, but in this case I believe it was meant to further strengthen the CTIX hand in partnering negotiations. In other words, Leo doing what he does.
icon url

starbuxsux

11/18/13 2:29 PM

#46277 RE: Brenum #46266

Brenum...why do you keep referring to "usually at the expense of the shareholder?"

I've been in CTIX for a really long time and I can't remember ever being caught in a public offering of any kind...and the deal for $10 million dollars with Aspire actually resulted in the net value of my CTIX holdings to more than double!

So can you clarify what you mean about every penny borrowed by CTIX is usually at the expense of the shareholder?

Thank you