I agree they can do more to be more specific about many things. And they should. I disagree though that whatever they did do on P3 is the final, that's it, never going up from there that's being implied. Processor 2 also started out very slowly. It didn't do what it did in Q4 its first quarter. It remains to be seen if they'll get up to sustainable 3,000 lbs/hour with P3.
"During the second half of the third quarter, we were able to run Processor 3 at higher sustained feed rates than on its initial cycle and we continue to conservatively increase feed rates to approach the processor’s optimal production capacity."
"Ideally, we are looking to consistently run at a total of roughly 3,000 pounds an hour on Processor 3"
Yes, it would be nice to know what the "initial cycle" rate was and what the "higher sustained feed rates" were instead of vague terms. If they get to 3,000 pounds, the machines will be monsters worth multiples more than the market cap.