I don't think Huff has a need to address that article nor should he. It appeared he had last time with the filing of the 8-k but that had to be done anyways and was already in the works. If our CEO has to address every negative article to prop up share price then the company has real issues.
Drop in pps is short term and temporary.
You can thank angry shareholders for that second article. If the first would have been ignored the second wouldn't have happened. People read the first got all worked up and showed there was a lot of interest. Increased interest means more visits to their website, means more hits for their advertisers , means more revenue for the MF. Why not do a second one? thrid one? The more traffic and interest he can create the more we'll see of the same. That's his job get readers to the website.
Think Barclay's, TIAA Creff or Vanguard have analysts of a lesser caliber than MF's Seth Joyner?
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
