Remember that the only reason I had to check into the previous CEO was because there were people who were PO'ed from the past and had posted here. I really am only interested in VRTY, but the more I looked into what the angry ones were talking about, including posts from two years ago accusing the CEO of AQLV of bad management or intentions, I realized that VRTY was getting painted as a bad investment based on the past and not the present nor future. So I go over to where that ex-CEO is now a CEO and what do I see? Well, you probably know.
I think you would agree that it is immaterial where the stock price is six months after the ex-CEO left. It is obvious that many old shareholders lost money when you look at a three year chart--2.5 years of it under the ex-CEO. The stock was pumped on PR's that were inaccurate or misleading. Could some of those angry shareholders have been buying when they believed in the PR's--maybe so. And they are ticked.
Now it looks like someone is trying to punish me here for what I have legitimately brought up on the other company. This post is on topic--because it addresses what you are trying to address. VRTY's past and how it relates to what is going on now.