Yes you are correct but read that carefully. "The Nuestra Señora de Concepcion carried gold coins and gold bars as well as a number of chests of silver coins". You might want to note that when DeBry wrote this article he drew from the Bibliography's listed at the bottom of that article. I don't know which one but I do recall that in either "Florida's golden Galleons" by Robert Burgess & Carl Clausen or "Golden Galleons, and Archaeology" by Burgess and Clausen again, what the 1715 Concepcion was carrying was cited. Furthermore, some time in the past I had seen a copy of this which was in Duke Long's possession which was provided by the researcher Jack Haskins. I am not disputing whether or not this Concepcion was carrying treasure as DeBry actually wrote but it wasn't very much.
When I refer to AGI references as in my past posting, that means the specific Legajo (document bundle) in the Archivo General de Indias. When a researcher provides that then there's no nonsense. As I stated before, possibly I just don't know and there were in fact two Concepcions in the fleet loss. I only know that the one I'm focusing on wasn't carrying very much treasure at all. With a company researcher like DeBry, I'm sure he can easily produce the translated treasure manifest (which isn't much) and the AGI source, and make everybody happy. My apologies if I'm wrong.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
