100% Toss vs. 0%toss smd123
Well yes, I see your point regarding their intent, but on its face, the actual text says other things to me:
Yes, 'public confidence in judicial integrity' is impaired
{but that happened as soon as his nibs spoke;}
, but after the comma,
we get to something actionable, the rectification of
'a serious distortion in a fundamental commodity market',
(because of a settlement).
blah blah, 'patents are unenforceable' does invite discreditation
by virtue of royalties, xlicense, etc. Sorry to rehash this yet again...
Anyway, my position is probably abundantly clear.
JMDO, IANAL
LOLo