Big Drivel, there are other factors that contribute to share price other that technology, market potential and management. But then, I am guessing you knew that. Looks like your post was just a segue to give Doc another opportunity to pose his oft repeated "the shareprice enigma" post.
Look, it's really no mystery why the share price is so low. I have said this before and was rediculed by Doc for contradicting myself. So here we go again...DNAPrint is a high risk penny stock with a lousy track record. It's a penny stock. Lots of investors avaoid them. It's high risk. They are spending more money than they are making. Many investors avoid such risks. They have a lousy track record. This stock has gone down due to the dilution necessary to fund their operations and product development.
Here's something else to consider. Investors are often advised to invest in companies they understand. DNAPrint can be challenging for many to understand. It's new, it's technical, it's a paradigm shift. But everytime a poster such as myself tries to point out how good the technology or market potential or management team is we are met with the response, "If they're so good why is the pps so low?" Thus diverting the attention from helping others understand the company better to a discussion of the pps, naked shorting, manipulation, dilution, financing, etc.
We all are aware that the pps is low. I don't think it's mystery why it is low. The question is what will it take to increase it. That's no mystery either: revenue. So now we have come full circle back to my original post that I like what DNAPrint has done with their technology, their building of a company posed to take advantage of that technology, and the people they have in place to see it all through to the generation of significant revenue. It is a risk. But I like what I see and it is my belief that they will succeed.
Virgil