InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

BBBabe

01/23/06 3:44 PM

#39965 RE: bigdrive99 #39963

It is worth more than a penny...and it's a disgrace that the company has not stopped this manipulation of their stock. Other companies are fighting mad and fighting back...and demanding that this insidious theft end now!
And it is stopping for those who dare and who care. This has been the most outrageous situation I have ever seen...for a company with so much at stake and so much potential to allow these dirtbag hedgefunds to continue to naked short this stock. No sane person would sell here...just shorters. If DNAG does not put a stop to this bleeding of their share price, then they should be held responsible for this
crash! If other companies warn the MM's and the SEC to make the illegal shorting stop, then DNAG OWES it to its investors to do the same.
I'm so fed up with this mess, I can't tell you
how much. For them to allow this to happen without lifting a finger to stop it is beyond the pale.
Wonder if anyone is home there...in the reasoning department...You can have all the wonderful potential in the world and the brightest minds working for you...but unless you stop illegal trading in your stock, it's
futile period. They owe that to us big time!
And to themselves!
Fed up
Babe
icon url

dr frudaky

01/23/06 4:01 PM

#39967 RE: bigdrive99 #39963

bigdrive99




You have asked the all important question concerning DNAG shareholder value for which, unfortunately, there is no absolute answer and remains to this day a complete mystery.

I have asked the exact same question many times before on this and the RB boards, but my inquiries have only been met with violent objections from those who simply do not wish to consider this important fact of extremely deep concern.

A possible reason is that perhaps, just maybe, those who know more than any of us on this fine message board, and with necessarily much deeper pockets to influence the pps than us, have summarily dismissed what DNAG has to offer as being inconsequential and without commercial merit. This is only an assumed possibility, and I am sure many here may have other more encouraging possible answer for this continuing mystery.

Again, this is JMHO.

dr f
icon url

Virgil Hilts

01/23/06 5:40 PM

#39970 RE: bigdrive99 #39963

Big Drivel, there are other factors that contribute to share price other that technology, market potential and management. But then, I am guessing you knew that. Looks like your post was just a segue to give Doc another opportunity to pose his oft repeated "the shareprice enigma" post.

Look, it's really no mystery why the share price is so low. I have said this before and was rediculed by Doc for contradicting myself. So here we go again...DNAPrint is a high risk penny stock with a lousy track record. It's a penny stock. Lots of investors avaoid them. It's high risk. They are spending more money than they are making. Many investors avoid such risks. They have a lousy track record. This stock has gone down due to the dilution necessary to fund their operations and product development.

Here's something else to consider. Investors are often advised to invest in companies they understand. DNAPrint can be challenging for many to understand. It's new, it's technical, it's a paradigm shift. But everytime a poster such as myself tries to point out how good the technology or market potential or management team is we are met with the response, "If they're so good why is the pps so low?" Thus diverting the attention from helping others understand the company better to a discussion of the pps, naked shorting, manipulation, dilution, financing, etc.

We all are aware that the pps is low. I don't think it's mystery why it is low. The question is what will it take to increase it. That's no mystery either: revenue. So now we have come full circle back to my original post that I like what DNAPrint has done with their technology, their building of a company posed to take advantage of that technology, and the people they have in place to see it all through to the generation of significant revenue. It is a risk. But I like what I see and it is my belief that they will succeed.

Virgil