InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

Gcbr

01/22/06 10:03 PM

#39896 RE: Mattu #39894

Matt---This is not just negative. This has been a well planed
attack on DNAG. It has gone on since Day One. Somebody knows
the plan.

Take Care
Arch
icon url

Gcbr

01/22/06 10:16 PM

#39898 RE: Mattu #39894

Matt---How do we do that till Friday?

Take Care
Arch
icon url

cosmiclifeform

01/22/06 10:18 PM

#39899 RE: Mattu #39894

Matt... "Don't remove someone because they are simply negative."

While I'm encouraged to see your flexibility and support for your monitors, your above (undefined) comment is sad to hear, as it leaves a major hole in holding people accountable on this board and making it more difficult to make an enjoyable place for everyone to comfortably discuss their investment.

The worst problems on these boards are the chronic dysfunctional negativity...where posters can freely defame and disparage companies and posters without ever being held accountable.

No one should be free to make false, unsubstantiated negative comments without proving them or providing verifiable references, research, links or other means to back up such affrontive accusations.

There is no possibility for reasonable conversation, debate, or discussion with absolute and unfounded negative statements... Such negative agendas require no proof and offer no room for discussion.

The key is....intent...not content.

The designed purpose and intent of the post should be paramount in determining TOS offenses and insuring the best for this community. Obsessively negative posts have only one intent...to disrupt or distract...not dialog.

Please see my previous post suggesting a new rule...Put Up or Shut Up! that would close this huge empty gap in accountability on this board.

Just to be clear...I view all "data" as pros and cons for any issue or company...not positive and negative. I do this to clarify and differentiate posters who do nicely to present reasonable concerns about their investment versus the obsessive negative agenda that continues to attack and paint DNAPrint as a total failure.

I don't have a problem with someone presenting the "cons" about DNAPrint. I do have a problem with the incessant disparaging and defaming of a company and it's management who are trying to help the world be a better place without holding those posters accountable...

Unfounded distortions and unsubstantiated falsehoods and chronicly obsessive fatalistic scenarios that leave no room for discussion are absolutely unacceptable and should not be allowed on this board...ever.

JMHO of course.

Thanks.

Robert


icon url

ole vern

01/22/06 11:37 PM

#39913 RE: Mattu #39894

Matt says:


"... it appears there are a few that'd gladly take your spot (Dr F, keep dreaming)..."


LOL!! Thank you, Matt. You've made my day.



LOL!


LOL!


LO-!


L