Would one of you please "sticky" the previous post by Markmanrunup. Both his top ten reasons and his previous post deserve to be stickied as they are invaluable information for WDDD investors.
Why would collateral estoppel apply to other defendants?
and
USC 35 states:
Meaning, any trial of actions arising after the COC would act as if it was always that way. It doesn't say shall have the same effect and operation in law for causes thereafter arising, it says shall have the same effect and operation in law 'on the trial of actions for causes' thereafter arising. Even if you read Activisions motions and replys, their argument is that the COC comes after the start of litigation and not before.IMO