InvestorsHub Logo

carpediem260

01/21/06 5:16 PM

#76652 RE: IH Geek [Dave] #76651

It was a sincere post and suggestion on how to improve this site but I see you guys would rather focus on your rules of the road (which is but one part of the equation) in making IHUB a better place to visit.

Personal attacks you say? Well the reasons for that pertain exclusively to a couple of individuals, one of whom is a regular RB poster with nearly 16000 posts on FASC alone. The other, chambers52, is only interested in manipulating discussion to suit his own ends and any criticism of the stock has to be on the very light end to qualify on his P&D thread. I know why I'm here and am not arguing that point at all. I think both posters are assholes and I'm sure the feeling is mutual. To me its more despicable that they are allowed to control a discussion concerning a company that has questionable and dubious management, a string of bogus PR's, and a loss of over 100% to investors over the past 6 years alone. Despite that, they paint a rosy picture of it all and want people to see only their side of the story because most over there have share positions over 500,000 and closer to 1-2 million.

Here's another thought. For penny stocks at the very least, the possibility of insiders starting discussions and moderating forums here is a real possibility as there is no way to verify on your end or ours just who these people are for certain. You may think you have an ideal setup here, but there is always room for improvement.

P.S. one last thing. On the matter of attacking posters out here, I'm not saying that calling vulgar names should be the norm, however questioning the integrity of certain individuals hyping stocks should be allowed because of the degree of weight they are perceived to carry among those that blindly follow and those a little less experienced. We both know an eloquent poster can sway the undecided or keep the faith among those that are having second thoughts.