InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

mr_sano

10/27/13 1:08 PM

#5125 RE: Zizek #5124

I think I've heard it all now. So in your view , HAL would just stand on the sidelines while a third party willing tests AOT?

Then after evaluating the millions in savings ( your estimate not mine) would hand it back on a silver platter with a stack of PO's and a big grin. This is about as symbiotic as a pimp and his street walkers working a convention of liquor store operators.

As far as temple is concerned they are in drivers seat if the technology works no matter what the economics. The operative word "works ". The concept that they would reduce a percentage based on the possibility of getting volume is a nice lead line but not based on facts... But hey don't let that stop you.

I get why you engage in this types of discussions. All this fluff is bound to suck a few people in that refuse to read a 10k...but this series of posts takes the cake . You sounded reasonable in your assessment of. JT's continuous claims of a this long shot M&A event. Apparently even you can't resist placing a bet on the hardway.

HAL isn't buying zero ... The share increases in not a poison pill or to add liquidity , it's just more of the same fluff to create excitement where there is little. Yes I know ,all here are long and strong to the final gong ,but at some point common sense must take hold.