My apologies about doubting your integrity.
1. How do you know what the ClipStream video quality results are "across the wide spectrum of computers"? All you have reported is the results on your computer.
Just from the posts on this board.
2. Using You Tube quality as the standard, what percentage of viewers of ClipStream videos must receive that quality in order for ClipStream to be successful? 50%, 75%, 100%?
For delivery to the public, whatever the percentage that Youtube reaches, which I think is 85%. Where delivery is to a known sub group, then security and/or time and money rather than quality will be the selling points.
3. Did you test the new video? If so, what were your results? Did you report your results to Steve? Would you post those results here as I have done? Thanks.
Yes, they are better:
Browser: Chrome and Firefox
Computer: Asus Intel Core i5, 3.0 GHz
Bandwidth: between 13 and 16MB, Time Warner Turbo
Windows 7
Test 3 best, but six re-bufferings lasting several seconds each, test 2 better than test 1, and Youtube still has better clarity, color,contrast and fluidity, but not nearly as much difference as before.
It would be very helpful to know what changes were made in the new demos to make them better, and whether there are more changes that could be made, or is perfecting Clipstream dependent on future greater bandwidth and cpu.
What is so interesting is that the dialogue on the board has really sharpened, to the point that Destiny mgt has become involved. That is totally cool and positive. Interactive management befits a tech company that delivers media.
I am still in a wait and see mode about how Clipstream is received at the Conference. That is not the be all and end all, but the people who attend are in the business, and their opinion about Clipstream and its potential will be knowledgeable and will have clout.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
