Replies to post #15139 on Worlds Inc (WDDD)

[cccc17]

It is 100% for greater public good. Think about old patent before 1996 with no applicant data sheet and with USPTO's error.

This WDDD's case clear all those concern in a general way.

right?

[gibson256]

i mean, you're probably right that the judge won't take it into consideration, but it can't hurt to try. I actually think the judge decided which way she was going to rule before or shortly after the hearing. It takes some time to write her opinion and ruling out. Smart judges never rule on a hearing like that at the end of the hearing...even if they already know which way they are going to rule.

[Bsav88atty]

I was kidding about the amicus brief a few days ago, plus it's too late to file the brief. The judge has everything she needs to make an informed ruling. Even so, amicus briefs are rarely filed by parties who do not have an interest in one side or the other. The weight to be afforded to an amicus brief rests in the validity of the arguments and cited legal authorities.

As to other posts here speculating about the percentage of the PP and baseless comments about further dilution, much will be resolved in the 8K. Anybody who is still talking about dilution is living in a state of delusion and merely attempting to scare folks into selling cheaply. Indeed, I suspect that this new PP will keep WDDD afloat through trial.