Presentation vs substance...doesn't really matter, they have briefs she will read, precedents she will review, case facts etc.
While ATVI's legal team certainly was more polished, as a bystander thinking to enter I am more concerned about the legal arguments and precedents used.
ATVI's attorney can grandstand like perry mason all he wants, what matters is the law, and unfortunately, there seems to be ALOT of conflicting arguments here, so for me its hard to decipher.
Personally, I think the risk is too high for me at this point given my losses in vrng and another potential binary outcome here (and my lack of REAL DEPTH / LAWYER level understanding of patent law).
Makes more sense to me to wait until the MSJ is addressed and if so dive in!
Good luck to the longs here
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
