as do we all. BUT if John Flanders told the SEC the truth and Scottsdale Capital Advisors knew nothing about his actions. I am sure they checked. Rhonda was the compliance officer there so he screwed her over as well as the firm she was listed as a founder of. Now she has left SCA. On good terms? If so then why hire an ex employee that screwed you and made you look bad to the regulators? Do you then hire that person and yet only introduce him in a vauge way? Then only when pressed address it? When they hired others they told you even about stupid ass correspondance classes. If I order a class from Harvard can I tell everyone I attend? So no doubt Rhonda knew about Johns past, why not explain it make it clear? Maybe Rhonda thought he took a fall for the firm? These are the people making the decions with our money and when you connect the dots it raises red flags.
What if she left SCA on bad terms? Was she involved? Who knows but when stuff is public and you try to sweep it past you you have to ask what else am I missing. I was buying a car one time and my dad said look at the over spry and I said so what I can get that finished correctly, he said thats the point and your not the one profiting from the sale. if they half assed the clean up what else is half ass that you dont see. Just because you want a car doesnt mean you take crap wrapped in a shinny paint job.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
AI
