I know, you're right, I understand your reasoning. Mine are only feelings, nothing more. This week I was convinced that there would be some PR, however the only thing we have so far is the latter PR, among other things wrote and set wrong. I'm a little 'disappointed, but not the end of the world. I was stupid to create my expectations, that's all. But, I repeat, is not a problem.
Here we continue to reiterate the fact that they paid $ 50K to present at the conference, but I do not think-imho-that we can base all of our expectations on this. There may be several reasons for paying $ 50K, the dumbest could be that there was no free room. Ok, it's not a smart idea, but to date all the assumptions may not be valid or not.
Why not give a tease in the PR like "the speakers plan to discuss the amazing synergies discovered in recently completed trials and what this means for the progress toward a potential cure for cancer". That one added line would help me to look forward to the event. Maybe they don't have that info?
Bungler, it was nice to finally see someone from Australia actually start looking in the right direction ever since that conference last year. I would think the print below and results are after months of research and hopefully it was all signs of success for Peregrine.