Replies to post #43801 on XpresSpa Group Inc (XSPA)

[Justice98]

Conceding that author posed it as a question, he didn't really give much reason to think that the workaround doesn't infringe. If he's going to pose such a question, the crux of the article should've been about why and how the workaround no longer infringes. This leads me to believe he doesn't really know what he's talking about.

[Captart7]

In summary, I think what the article expresses is a future position that would be appropriate for a negotiation between Vringo and Google in some sort of a license agreement. An honest firm can discuss how much of an infringement is worth on Vringo's patent.

But, I see it as having no effect on the hard reality of is it still infringing on a Valid Patent. Is it a workaround or not? Not is it a good try? Too little too late IMHO.

This is not a game of Horseshoes is it? Google is not exactly a new firm coming in with clean hands in this instance?
If there is any justice, this scam will not work at this late date on JJ's decision.