InvestorsHub Logo

roytoy6969

09/24/13 8:55 PM

#86307 RE: roytoy6969 #86306

one more...

CCGI insists that JNS was not a “good faith
purchaser” of the Chicago Assets, and that “for the APA to be
valid, JNS Power must have been without actual knowledge of any
defect in title or any pending claim.” CCGI’s SJ Mem. at 12
[3124 DN 41-2]. Among the numerous flaws in this argument, the
most prominent is that CCGI relies exclusively on cases governed
by statutes and legal principles not applicable here, and offers
neither authority nor reasoned analysis for construing them to
invalidate the APA.

Chili Palmer

09/24/13 9:15 PM

#86309 RE: roytoy6969 #86306

What's this?