InvestorsHub Logo

payperview

09/21/13 11:00 AM

#65447 RE: TraderUsa #65445

First, there is no legit reason for you to know that, and if you do know that, pray, let us know how you know it.

Second, it serves no purpose to BCCI to do that. The majority of the shares are in the hands of the few that paid much more that current prices and they will not let go cheaply.

Third, the only thing worth doing with this outfit is to buy an existing business and start running in through the shell, sort of like Barry did with BCCI. That is the only way he is going to get a run on the stock in order to sell.

Fourth, Barry is not in the business of buying shares; he is in the business of selling them.

There are thousands of businesses for sale in the Greater Seattle Metropolitan area. Barry is not so dumb as to move funds around for no good reason at all. He is definitely dishonest, but he is not disingenuous.

payperview

09/22/13 12:58 PM

#65448 RE: TraderUsa #65445

If anything, what would make sense is RLTR buying shares of BCCI. Also, the idea of a take over is not worthwhile.

If one company owns a substantial number of shares in the other, what benefits the stock price in one would benefit the stock price in the other. Thus, to the objectives of the Barry Henthorn schemes, having one that more corporation is beneficiary. In fact, he would be in a better position if he controlled, in one way or another, four or five companies.

Also beneficiary could be owning stocks in other corporations, from penny stocks to better run companies, as well as, trading in options, if done properly. We all know, or should know, how the price of ICTN benefited from the claim of its stock position in RLTR. I would not be surprised if all of the sudden he claimed that RLTR has a stake in BCCI, and that RLTR has made a deal of some kind to generate revenues.