InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

MTM

09/10/13 2:26 PM

#22571 RE: Kingrudy #22570

Agreed. CYPW management controls the PR flow. If any of those PRs contain errors and/or omissions, CYPW management is solely responsible for those. If CYPW management knowingly issued false PRs, that is called fraud.

Having dealt with Chris Nelson in another life, I would not take his word on anything relating to his interest in - or management of - CYPW. He's out for the "quick buck" any way that he can get it.
icon url

pennypicker42

09/10/13 2:36 PM

#22572 RE: Kingrudy #22570

I don't see anything about 1500 a month so I can't answer that but when you sell a prototype in beta where's the lie? Some early adopters thought they could fix the problems faster/better than CYPW. Because they were unable to, is not always CYPW's fault. Have you bothered to look at the facilities at Bent glass, this is a small glass company and not engine designers. It took some qualified engineers and materials specialists to get it where it is now. some light down the track we'll just have see. LSR? oops; don't know, don't care much. Much more interesting things to investigate.
It would be so much easier if this was my only stock but.
I wouldn't blame a software company if my Beta product has problems its my choice not to wait for a finished product. High interest rates, well look around, corporate money isn't easy for anyone these days.