There has been no provision of primary or secondary sources for the statements below. All of those statements, assertions and opinions have no support whatsoever in primary or secondary sources.
If there is support please provide it.
All info on the compilation has been read and no support for items listed below has been found. If support cannot be provided for each, then this is a last request.
The request is not for proof of the factuality, simply support in primary and secondary sources.
No more requests will be made for support of these statements, assertions and opinions.
If support is not provided, it is then finally certain that the list is composed of vacuous statements, assertions and opinions.
So far there is no support for the following statements:
* Bollies dont account for market realities...only numbers.
* What do we know that would lead us to believe the suits are playing out great? I don't believe we have the information to make that call at this point. Looks to me like the court is aiming to shoot down all the claims at once. Not good.
* Economists the world over are calling this a secondary bubble. Be weary.
* There is no evidence proving the (hedge) fund owns common shares at this point in time. All we know is that they sold a ton into the retail hype up to $5. It is more likely that they no longer hold commons :(
* It is more likely that the rule of law will dictate that there is no just cause to bring the suits in the first place, and all the cases will be shot down immediately.
* Huge short positions entered into by hedge funds...theyre trying to break down the 1.20s.
* All of them (Democratic bills not yet submitted for review) aim to wind down Fannie Mae :(
* Hedge funds shorting. Follow the money.
* It looks like some major institutions could be ramping up their short positions. This will be another red week.
*Let me rephrase... No hedge fund holds a stock like FNMA IN IT'S PRESENT FORM through 500% gains. Retail now owns Berkowitz's common stock :(
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
