InvestorsHub Logo
icon url

grizzy

01/09/06 12:02 PM

#3370 RE: dlewisfl #3369

I'm confused as to why you take issue here.

When a company makes promises and beefs itself up it's trying to attract investors; that is, people who are willing to give their money to help the company further their growth. When an investor buys in because of the company's hype, there is an expectation that the company will be acting in the investor's best interest.

Sand has shown quite clearly that they were *not* acting in the investors best interest, because now a great number of investors will have to wait for an extremely long period just to break even.

And so we're pissed. And we have every right to be. I see nothing wrong with that.
icon url

grizzy

01/09/06 12:05 PM

#3371 RE: dlewisfl #3369

And as to the unwise time, I meant that the company looked like it was worth much more than .04 due to the company's promises, hype, etc...if I hadn't taken their word for it I would not have bought at .04 because it was near the top of what looked like a run...

it dropped to .03 then, and then to .02, and I didn't sell because I still believed Sand's BS about the company's future. Then the R/S came and that was the end of it, and Sand's shareholder confidence turned out to be unfounded and most of us felt duped. Which we were, as some of us called the company and were told no R/S was being discussed.