Forbes like Barrons and I am sure other magazines as well, have a tendency to follow up on their recommendations. I would guess, that the court case is closely monitored by Forbes especially as we have some 3 important Dates within the next 4 weeks, as taken from the court-paper. But I would guess other financial magazines are Monitoring this case as well as the Story: David versus Goliath is something your are not getting everyday. And let us not Forget, DECN is now free to sell their Genstrips based on an earlier decision by the court.
For the reasons stated above, the Court GRANTS defendants motion and ORDERS LifeScan to show cause why it should not be held in contempt for violating the Protective Order. The parties shall address appropriate remedies in their briefing on the order to show cause. LifeScan shall file its opening brief by September 11, 2013. Defendants shall respond on September 25, 2013, and include the evidentiary basis for any monetary remedies sought—the Court will not restrict LifeScan?s access to confidential material, dissolve the preliminary injunction, nor terminate the lawsuit. LifeScan may file a Reply by October 9, 2013. The Court will determine whether a hearing is necessary after the briefing is complete.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
